WADL in a bottle eating noodlesSolution ·
In my last entry about REST web services I talked about its biggest weakness for me: the lack of description model of REST services.
The idea of hitting an HTTP endpoint as a shot in the dark is for me quite a leap of faith, and very likely an invitation to spend hours troubleshooting.
But despair no more, enters WADL! If it sounds like WSDL, it’s because it’s essentially the same acronym:
Web Service Definition Language -> WSDL
Web Application Description Language -> WADL
So WADL aims to be the WSDL of REST.
But… it was submitted the W3C in December 2009 by Sun Microsystem… one month before it was acquired by Oracle. Since them, it hasn’t budged… coincidence?
No other parties seem to have backed it, so it seems deemed to join the junkyard of unilateral attempt at standardizing global assets!
You can look up at an example on Wikipedia.
Maybe we’ll have another standard one day. Or maybe it’s a non-issue and I’m the only one to worry about it.